North Carolina State University researchers designed a textile \u201cPlant Armor\u201d that forces insects to navigate a maze-like path if they try to reach a plant. The design was more effective at blocking insects from reaching cabbage plants in multiple experiments, compared with an alternative crop cover.<\/p>\n\n\n
Based on their findings<\/a>, researchers said the Plant Armor could provide a more effective, chemical-free alternative for insect protection.<\/p>\n\n\n \u201cWe found it\u2019s possible to use this new technology to protect against insects we didn\u2019t think we could protect against,\u201d said the study\u2019s first author Grayson Cave<\/a>, a doctoral candidate at NC State. \u201cWe\u2019ve shown we can use a mechanical barrier that will protect against tobacco thrips and possibly other insects, allowing the plant to grow and thrive underneath.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n Previously, plant covers have been designed to exclude insects based on size alone \u2013 like a window screen \u2013 researchers said. However, that strategy can be problematic for trying to keep out insects as small as tobacco thrips, which are about the size of a pencil point.<\/p>\n\n\n \u201cTo exclude insects that are really small using traditional textile cover designs, the size of the openings would have to be so small that it would also prevent water, air and moisture from penetrating,\u201d said the study\u2019s senior researcher Mike Roe<\/a>, William Neal Reynolds Distinguished Professor of Entomology at NC State. \u201cWe had to come up with another way of excluding the insects other than just based on pore size.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n To that end, the researchers designed a three-layer, 3D cover knitted using clear yarn in the outermost and innermost layers. The yarn, which can be made from recycled plastic, still allows sunlight to pass through, but restricts insects from reaching plants. A knitted inner layer is sandwiched perpendicular to the two surrounding layers, creating a maze-like structure within the Plant Armor.<\/p>\n\n\n \u201cWith our design, the insect has to figure out how to get through the maze to get to the plant on the other side,\u201d Roe said. \u201cThe tortuosity makes it more challenging to get through. The insect has a certain amount of time to find food or it will die. That time is relatively fast for a young insect.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n In the first of three experiments, researchers found it took significantly longer for insects to penetrate the Plant Armor. They placed a cabbage leaf and 10 tobacco thrips inside a Petri dish, separated by the Plant Armor or another crop cover. It took approximately three hours for five of the thrips to make it through the Plant Armor, while it took only 12 minutes for them to cross a commercially available, single-layer crop cover. In the same experiment with young, unfed caterpillars, their design was nearly 90% effective at preventing unfed young caterpillars from crossing the Plant Armor in 12 hours.<\/p>\n\n\n \u201cIn real life, the insect has a lot of other choices of where to go to find food; this was a worst-case scenario where they had only one place to go,\u201d Roe said. \u201cSo we expect in the natural environment, the protection is going to be much greater.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n When researchers tested how well they could protect potted cabbage plants inside a cage with unfed caterpillars, uncovered plants were infested and almost completely eaten, while plants covered and sealed with Plant Armor were not. They did not find a single caterpillar on the covered plants after 10 days.<\/p>\n\n\n Their last experiment was a three-month, outdoor field trial testing how well the Plant Armor worked when they used it like a greenhouse cover. The researchers found plants covered with Plant Armor were larger on average; the weight of cabbages under the Plant Armor was almost three times larger than the control.<\/p>\n\n\n Researchers said more work is needed to determine whether they successfully excluded insects due to the thickness, pore size or maze-like structure of the inner layer. However, their work provides evidence that their chemical-free design can work against tiny critters.<\/p>\n\n\n \u201cThrips are extremely tiny,\u201d Cave said. \u201cIf we could keep them out, we think we have a good chance of keeping other, larger insects out. And as for the neonate caterpillars \u2013 they have to feed immediately, and they\u2019re the tiniest stage of caterpillars. This gives us some good, preliminary data that this would work toward being protective against other caterpillars too.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n Researchers think their crop cover could be a good alternative for high-value crops like grapes. In future research, they also want to explore whether the cover could be used to help protect plants in extreme conditions \u2013 and as the climate changes.<\/p>\n\n\n \u201cPart of what we\u2019re doing is finding new, smart textiles,\u201d said study co-author Andre West<\/a>, associate professor of textile, apparel and technology management at NC State and director of Zeis Textiles Extension. \u201cWe think this design could help farmers in extreme environments or where crop production is limited in certain areas. It could also be an alternative for organic farmers. Not only is the product itself made with some recycled materials, but it could also be recycled again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n The study, \u201cNovel 3-D Spacer Textiles to Protect Crops from Insect-Infestation and that Enhance Plant Growth,\u201d<\/a> was published online in the journal Agriculture<\/em>. Co-authors include Marian G. McCord, senior vice provost at the University of New Hampshire and adjunct professor in the NC State Department of Forest Biomaterials; Bryan Koene and Benjamin Beck of Luna Innovations; and Jean M. Deguenon and Kun Luan, postdoctoral research scholars at NC State. <\/p>\n\n\n This paper is based upon on work supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, under Agreement No. 2015-33610-23785 of the Small Business Innovation Research Grants Program. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Cave was supported in part by a teaching assistantship from NC State, and Cave and Roe are supported by the N.C. Agricultural Experiment Station.<\/p>\n\n\n Conflicts of interest: Vector Textiles holds exclusive license for a patent <\/a>connected to the Plant Armor technology. McCord, Roe, and West are inventors on the patent related to the technology owned by NC State, and would share in revenues derived from commercialization.<\/p>\n\n\n -oleniacz-<\/p>\n\n\n Note to editors<\/strong>: The abstract follows.<\/p>\n\n\n \u201cNovel 3-D Spacer Textiles to Protect Crops from Insect-Infestation and that Enhance Plant Growth\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n Authors<\/strong>: Grayson L. Cave, Andre J. West, Marian G. McCord, Bryan Koene, Benjamin Beck, Jean M. Deguenon, Kun Luan and R. Michael Roe.<\/p>\n\n\n Published<\/strong> online March 31, 2022, in Agriculture<\/a><\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n DOI<\/strong>: 10.3390\/agriculture12040498<\/p>\n\n\n Abstract<\/strong>: Pesticide-free, 3D, spacer fabrics (Plant Armor Generation (PA Gen) 1 and 2) were investigated for proof-of-concept as an insect barrier to protect plants and improve plant agronomics for organic farming. The time to 50% penetration (TP50<\/sub>) for tobacco thrips, Frankliniella fusca<\/em>, adults in laboratory Petri dish bioassays was 30 and 175 min for PA Gen 1 and 2, respectively, and 12 min for the control (a commercially available, single layer-crop cover, Proteknet). PA Gen 2 was >90% resistant to penetration of unfed caterpillar neonates, Helicoverpa zea<\/em>, while the TP50<\/sub>\u2018s for Gen 1 and Proteknet were 3.1 and 2.35 h, respectively. In small cage studies, PA Gen 2 covered potted cabbage plants was 100% resistant to penetration by these insects through 12 d after which the study was ended. In small field plot studies for 3 summer months, cabbage plants grew approximately twice as fast when covered versus not covered with Gen 1 and Gen 2 without the need for insecticides or herbicides. This was not observed for the control crop cover. Martindale abrasion tests demonstrated Gen 1 and 2 were at least 6- and 1.8-fold more durable than the control crop cover used. Data are also presented on percentage light, water, air, and water vapor penetration across each textile and operational temperatures and humidity for cabbage plants covered and uncovered in small field plots. <\/p>\n This post was originally published<\/a> in NC State News.<\/em><\/p>","protected":false,"raw":"\n North Carolina State University researchers designed a textile \u201cPlant Armor\u201d that forces insects to navigate a maze-like path if they try to reach a plant. The design was more effective at blocking insects from reaching cabbage plants in multiple experiments, compared with an alternative crop cover.<\/p>\n\n\n Based on their findings<\/a>, researchers said the Plant Armor could provide a more effective, chemical-free alternative for insect protection.<\/p>\n\n\n \u201cWe found it\u2019s possible to use this new technology to protect against insects we didn\u2019t think we could protect against,\u201d said the study\u2019s first author Grayson Cave<\/a>, a doctoral candidate at NC State. \u201cWe\u2019ve shown we can use a mechanical barrier that will protect against tobacco thrips and possibly other insects, allowing the plant to grow and thrive underneath.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n Previously, plant covers have been designed to exclude insects based on size alone \u2013 like a window screen \u2013 researchers said. However, that strategy can be problematic for trying to keep out insects as small as tobacco thrips, which are about the size of a pencil point.<\/p>\n\n\n \u201cTo exclude insects that are really small using traditional textile cover designs, the size of the openings would have to be so small that it would also prevent water, air and moisture from penetrating,\u201d said the study\u2019s senior researcher Mike Roe<\/a>, William Neal Reynolds Distinguished Professor of Entomology at NC State. \u201cWe had to come up with another way of excluding the insects other than just based on pore size.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n To that end, the researchers designed a three-layer, 3D cover knitted using clear yarn in the outermost and innermost layers. The yarn, which can be made from recycled plastic, still allows sunlight to pass through, but restricts insects from reaching plants. A knitted inner layer is sandwiched perpendicular to the two surrounding layers, creating a maze-like structure within the Plant Armor.<\/p>\n\n\n \u201cWith our design, the insect has to figure out how to get through the maze to get to the plant on the other side,\u201d Roe said. \u201cThe tortuosity makes it more challenging to get through. The insect has a certain amount of time to find food or it will die. That time is relatively fast for a young insect.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n In the first of three experiments, researchers found it took significantly longer for insects to penetrate the Plant Armor. They placed a cabbage leaf and 10 tobacco thrips inside a Petri dish, separated by the Plant Armor or another crop cover. It took approximately three hours for five of the thrips to make it through the Plant Armor, while it took only 12 minutes for them to cross a commercially available, single-layer crop cover. In the same experiment with young, unfed caterpillars, their design was nearly 90% effective at preventing unfed young caterpillars from crossing the Plant Armor in 12 hours.<\/p>\n\n\n \u201cIn real life, the insect has a lot of other choices of where to go to find food; this was a worst-case scenario where they had only one place to go,\u201d Roe said. \u201cSo we expect in the natural environment, the protection is going to be much greater.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n When researchers tested how well they could protect potted cabbage plants inside a cage with unfed caterpillars, uncovered plants were infested and almost completely eaten, while plants covered and sealed with Plant Armor were not. They did not find a single caterpillar on the covered plants after 10 days.<\/p>\n\n\n Their last experiment was a three-month, outdoor field trial testing how well the Plant Armor worked when they used it like a greenhouse cover. The researchers found plants covered with Plant Armor were larger on average; the weight of cabbages under the Plant Armor was almost three times larger than the control.<\/p>\n\n\n Researchers said more work is needed to determine whether they successfully excluded insects due to the thickness, pore size or maze-like structure of the inner layer. However, their work provides evidence that their chemical-free design can work against tiny critters.<\/p>\n\n\n \u201cThrips are extremely tiny,\u201d Cave said. \u201cIf we could keep them out, we think we have a good chance of keeping other, larger insects out. And as for the neonate caterpillars \u2013 they have to feed immediately, and they\u2019re the tiniest stage of caterpillars. This gives us some good, preliminary data that this would work toward being protective against other caterpillars too.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n Researchers think their crop cover could be a good alternative for high-value crops like grapes. In future research, they also want to explore whether the cover could be used to help protect plants in extreme conditions \u2013 and as the climate changes.<\/p>\n\n\n \u201cPart of what we\u2019re doing is finding new, smart textiles,\u201d said study co-author Andre West<\/a>, associate professor of textile, apparel and technology management at NC State and director of Zeis Textiles Extension. \u201cWe think this design could help farmers in extreme environments or where crop production is limited in certain areas. It could also be an alternative for organic farmers. Not only is the product itself made with some recycled materials, but it could also be recycled again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n The study, \u201cNovel 3-D Spacer Textiles to Protect Crops from Insect-Infestation and that Enhance Plant Growth,\u201d<\/a> was published online in the journal Agriculture<\/em>. Co-authors include Marian G. McCord, senior vice provost at the University of New Hampshire and adjunct professor in the NC State Department of Forest Biomaterials; Bryan Koene and Benjamin Beck of Luna Innovations; and Jean M. Deguenon and Kun Luan, postdoctoral research scholars at NC State. <\/p>\n\n\n This paper is based upon on work supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, under Agreement No. 2015-33610-23785 of the Small Business Innovation Research Grants Program. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Cave was supported in part by a teaching assistantship from NC State, and Cave and Roe are supported by the N.C. Agricultural Experiment Station.<\/p>\n\n\n Conflicts of interest: Vector Textiles holds exclusive license for a patent <\/a>connected to the Plant Armor technology. McCord, Roe, and West are inventors on the patent related to the technology owned by NC State, and would share in revenues derived from commercialization.<\/p>\n\n\n -oleniacz-<\/p>\n\n\n